| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 2.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in Evope Core 1.1.3.20. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. Performing a manipulation results in hard-coded key. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2025-56577. The attack is only possible with local access. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Evope Core 1.1.3.20. It has been classified as problematic. This affects some unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a hard-coded key vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-321. The use of a hard-coded cryptographic key significantly increases the possibility that encrypted data may be recovered. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
An issue in Evope Core v.1.1.3.20 allows a local attacker to obtain sensitive information via the use of hard coded cryptographic keys.
The advisory is shared at packetstorm.news. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-56577 since 08/17/2025. The exploitability is told to be difficult. An attack has to be approached locally. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1600.001 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 2.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 2.4
VulDB Base Score: 2.5
VulDB Temp Score: 2.4
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Hard-coded keyCWE: CWE-321 / CWE-320
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
08/17/2025 CVE reserved08/29/2025 Advisory disclosed
08/29/2025 VulDB entry created
08/29/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: packetstorm.newsStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-56577 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-56577
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-321981
Entry
Created: 08/29/2025 23:34Changes: 08/29/2025 23:34 (52)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.