D-Link DI-7400G+ 19.12.25A1 /mng_platform.asp sub_478D28 addr command injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in D-Link DI-7400G+ 19.12.25A1. Affected by this vulnerability is the function sub_478D28 of the file /mng_platform.asp. This manipulation of the argument addr with the input `echo 12345 > poc.txt` causes command injection.
The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-9769. It is feasible to perform the attack on the physical device. Furthermore, there is an exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in D-Link DI-7400G+ 19.12.25A1 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function sub_478D28 of the file /mng_platform.asp. The manipulation of the argument addr with the input value `echo 12345 > poc.txt` leads to a command injection vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-77. The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2025-9769. The exploitation appears to be easy. An attack has to be approached locally. Technical details and also a public exploit are known. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1202 for this issue.
It is possible to download the exploit at github.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. By approaching the search of inurl:mng_platform.asp it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.dlink.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.7
VulDB Base Score: 4.1
VulDB Temp Score: 3.7
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 6.2
NVD Vector: 🔒
CNA Base Score: 4.1
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Command injectionCWE: CWE-77 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: Yes
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔒
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔒
Google Hack: 🔒
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
08/31/2025 Advisory disclosed08/31/2025 VulDB entry created
09/05/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Vendor: dlink.comAdvisory: github.com
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-9769 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-9769
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-322069
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 08/31/2025 19:15Updated: 09/05/2025 01:16
Changes: 08/31/2025 19:15 (57), 09/01/2025 10:45 (30), 09/05/2025 01:16 (11)
Complete: 🔍
Submitter: xuanyu
Cache ID: 216::103
Submit
Accepted
- Submit #640779: D-Link DI-7400G+ 19.12.25A1 Command Injection (by xuanyu)
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.