Google Android 16 VoicemailSettingsActivity.java onActivityResult confused deputy
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.1 | $5k-$25k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in Google Android 16. Affected by this issue is the function onActivityResult of the file VoicemailSettingsActivity.java. Performing a manipulation results in Local Privilege Escalation.
This vulnerability was named CVE-2025-32346. The attack needs to be approached locally. There is no available exploit.
Applying a patch is the recommended action to fix this issue.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Google Android 16. This affects the function onActivityResult of the file VoicemailSettingsActivity.java. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a local privilege escalation vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-441. The product receives a request, message, or directive from an upstream component, but the product does not sufficiently preserve the original source of the request before forwarding the request to an external actor that is outside of the product's control sphere. This causes the product to appear to be the source of the request, leading it to act as a proxy or other intermediary between the upstream component and the external actor. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
In onActivityResult of VoicemailSettingsActivity.java, there is a possible work profile contact number leak due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
The advisory is shared at source.android.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-32346 since 04/05/2025. The exploitability is told to be easy. An attack has to be approached locally. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $5k-$25k at the moment (estimation calculated on 09/07/2025).
Applying a patch is able to eliminate this problem.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at EUVD (EUVD-2025-26831) and CERT Bund (WID-SEC-2025-1944). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Affected
- Google Android
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.google.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Confused deputyCWE: CWE-441
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: PatchStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
04/05/2025 CVE reserved09/04/2025 Advisory disclosed
09/04/2025 VulDB entry created
09/07/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Vendor: google.comAdvisory: source.android.com
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2025-32346 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-32346
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-322653
EUVD: 🔒
CERT Bund: WID-SEC-2025-1944 - Android Patchday September 2025: Multiple Vulnerabilities
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20150917
Entry
Created: 09/04/2025 21:53Updated: 09/07/2025 21:02
Changes: 09/04/2025 21:53 (55), 09/06/2025 03:18 (2), 09/06/2025 07:10 (1), 09/07/2025 21:02 (7)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.