| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.6 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Grayscale BandSite CMS 1.1. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation of the argument GLOBALS[root_path] leads to file inclusion. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2006-4984. The attack may be initiated remotely. In addition, an exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Grayscale BandSite CMS 1.1 (Content Management System). It has been rated as critical. This issue affects an unknown functionality. The manipulation of the argument GLOBALS[root_path] with an unknown input leads to a file inclusion vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-73. The product allows user input to control or influence paths or file names that are used in filesystem operations. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Multiple PHP remote file inclusion vulnerabilities in Grayscale BandSite CMS allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the GLOBALS[root_path] parameter in (1) adminpanel/includes/mailinglist/mlist_xls.php and (2) adminpanel/includes/add_forms/addmp3.php. NOTE: the other vectors from the original disclosure are already covered by CVE-2006-3193.
The weakness was presented 09/25/2006 by HACKERS PAL as not defined posting (Bugtraq). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2006-4984 since 09/25/2006. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details as well as a public exploit are known.
The exploit is available at securityfocus.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (29083) and SecurityFocus (BID 20137†). See VDB-32455 and VDB-32454 for similar entries. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.6
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.6
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: File inclusionCWE: CWE-73
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
09/21/2006 🔍09/25/2006 🔍
09/25/2006 🔍
09/25/2006 🔍
03/12/2015 🔍
04/12/2019 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Researcher: HACKERS PAL
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2006-4984 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2006-4984
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-32453
X-Force: 29083 - Grayscale BandSite CMS GLOBALS[root_path] file include
SecurityFocus: 20137 - Grayscale BandSite CMS Multiple Input Validation Vulnerabilities
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/12/2015 15:51Updated: 04/12/2019 08:47
Changes: 03/12/2015 15:51 (58), 04/12/2019 08:47 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.