themelooks FoodBook Plugin up to 4.7.1 on WordPress insertion of sensitive information into sent data
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in themelooks FoodBook Plugin up to 4.7.1 on WordPress. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in insertion of sensitive information into sent data. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2025-60125. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in themelooks FoodBook Plugin up to 4.7.1 on WordPress. This affects an unknown code block. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a insertion of sensitive information into sent data vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-201. The code transmits data to another actor, but a portion of the data includes sensitive information that should not be accessible to that actor. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data vulnerability in themelooks FoodBook allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data. This issue affects FoodBook: from n/a through 4.7.1.
The weakness was disclosed by Bonds. The advisory is shared at patchstack.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-60125 since 09/25/2025. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 09/26/2025). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1592 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.2
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 5.3
CNA Vector (Patchstack): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Insertion of sensitive information into sent dataCWE: CWE-201 / CWE-200 / CWE-284
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
09/25/2025 CVE reserved09/26/2025 Advisory disclosed
09/26/2025 VulDB entry created
09/26/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: patchstack.comResearcher: Bonds
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-60125 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-60125
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-326037
Entry
Created: 09/26/2025 11:20Changes: 09/26/2025 11:20 (63)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.