AndSoft e-TMS 25.03 /clt/LOGINFRM_DJO.ASP m os command injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in AndSoft e-TMS 25.03 and classified as critical. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /clt/LOGINFRM_DJO.ASP. This manipulation of the argument m causes os command injection. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-59736. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in AndSoft e-TMS 25.03 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown part of the file /clt/LOGINFRM_DJO.ASP. The manipulation of the argument m with an unknown input leads to a os command injection vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-78. The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Operating system command injection vulnerability in AndSoft's e-TMS v25.03. This vulnerability allows an attacker to execute operating system commands on the server by sending a POST request. The relationship between parameter and assigned identifier is a 'm' parameter in '/clt/LOGINFRM_DJO.ASP'.
The weakness was shared by Maximilian Hildebrand. The advisory is shared at incibe.es. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2025-59736 since 09/19/2025. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 10/02/2025). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1202 for this issue.
By approaching the search of inurl:clt/LOGINFRM_DJO.ASP it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Os command injectionCWE: CWE-78 / CWE-77 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Google Hack: 🔒
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
09/19/2025 CVE reserved10/02/2025 Advisory disclosed
10/02/2025 VulDB entry created
10/02/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: incibe.esResearcher: Maximilian Hildebrand
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-59736 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-59736
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-326749
Entry
Created: 10/02/2025 18:46Changes: 10/02/2025 18:46 (68)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.