Emlog Pro up to 2.5.21 Twitter Feature cross site scripting

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Emlog Pro up to 2.5.21. This impacts an unknown function of the component Twitter Feature. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2025-61599. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in Emlog Pro up to 2.5.21 and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component Twitter Feature. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. Impacted is confidentiality, and integrity. The summary by CVE is:

Emlog is an open source website building system. A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the "Twitter"feature of EMLOG Pro 2.5.21 and below. An authenticated user with privileges to post a "Twitter" message can inject arbitrary JavaScript code. The malicious script is stored on the server and gets executed in the browser of any user, including administrators, when they click on the malicious post to view it. This issue does not currently have a fix.

The advisory is shared at github.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-61599 since 09/26/2025. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2025-32224). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Vendor

• Emlog

Name

• Pro

Version

• 2.5.0
• 2.5.1
• 2.5.2
• 2.5.3
• 2.5.4
• 2.5.5
• 2.5.6
• 2.5.7
• 2.5.8
• 2.5.9
• 2.5.10
• 2.5.11
• 2.5.12
• 2.5.13
• 2.5.14
• 2.5.15
• 2.5.16
• 2.5.17
• 2.5.18
• 2.5.19
• 2.5.20
• 2.5.21

CPE 2.3info

• 🔒
• 🔒
• 🔒

CPE 2.2info

• 🔒
• 🔒
• 🔒

CVSSv4info

CVSSv3info

CVSSv2info

Exploitinginfo

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Countermeasuresinfo

Timelineinfo

Sourcesinfo

Entryinfo

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion