JhumanJ OpnForm up to 1.9.3 API Endpoint cross-site request forgery

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability has been found in JhumanJ OpnForm up to 1.9.3 and classified as problematic. This affects an unknown function of the component API Endpoint. This manipulation causes cross-site request forgery. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-11442. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Furthermore, there is an exploit available. The vendor has stated that API calls require authentication through Authorization Bearer Tokens, so classic CSRF attacks do not apply here. An attacker would need to possess the JWT through means such as XSS which were mitigated, disabling any form of initial access.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability has been found in JhumanJ OpnForm up to 1.9.3 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown part of the component API Endpoint. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. As an impact it is known to affect integrity.

It is possible to read the advisory at docs.google.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2025-11442. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available.

It is possible to download the exploit at docs.google.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vendor has stated that API calls require authentication through Authorization Bearer Tokens, so classic CSRF attacks do not apply here. An attacker would need to possess the JWT through means such as XSS which were mitigated, disabling any form of initial access.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Productinfo

Vendor

• JhumanJ

Name

• OpnForm

Version

• 1.9.0
• 1.9.1
• 1.9.2
• 1.9.3

CPE 2.3info

• 🔒
• 🔒
• 🔒

CPE 2.2info

• 🔒
• 🔒
• 🔒

CVSSv4info

CVSSv3info

CVSSv2info

Exploitinginfo

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Countermeasuresinfo

Timelineinfo

Sourcesinfo

Entryinfo

Submitinfo

Accepted

• Submit #666889: GitHub OpnForm 1.9.3 Cross-Site Request Forgery (by balejin)

Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Discussion