wonderwhy-er DesktopCommanderMCP up to 0.2.13 Absolute Path src/command-manager.ts extractBaseCommand os command injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as critical has been detected in wonderwhy-er DesktopCommanderMCP up to 0.2.13. The impacted element is the function extractBaseCommand of the file src/command-manager.ts of the component Absolute Path Handler. Performing a manipulation results in os command injection.
This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2025-11490. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Furthermore, there is an exploit available.
The vendor explains: "The usual use case is that AI is asked to do something, picks commands itself, and typically uses simple command names without absolute paths. It's curious why a user would ask the model to bypass restrictions this way. (...) This could potentially be a problem, but we are yet to hear reports of this being an issue in actual workflows. We'll leave this issue open for situations where people may report this as a problem for the long term."
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in wonderwhy-er DesktopCommanderMCP up to 0.2.13. This affects the function extractBaseCommand of the file src/command-manager.ts of the component Absolute Path Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a os command injection vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-78. The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
The weakness was shared by Max Alster-Caminer (crem) with Mantel as 218. The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-11490. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Technical details and a public exploit are known. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1202 for this issue.
The exploit is shared for download at github.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vendor explains: "The usual use case is that AI is asked to do something, picks commands itself, and typically uses simple command names without absolute paths. It's curious why a user would ask the model to bypass restrictions this way. (...) This could potentially be a problem, but we are yet to hear reports of this being an issue in actual workflows. We'll leave this issue open for situations where people may report this as a problem for the long term."
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2025-33288). Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
Website
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.4
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔒
CNA Base Score: 6.3
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Os command injectionCWE: CWE-78 / CWE-77 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔒
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
10/08/2025 Advisory disclosed10/08/2025 VulDB entry created
12/12/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: 218
Researcher: Max Alster-Caminer (crem)
Organization: Mantel
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔒
CVE: CVE-2025-11490 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-11490
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-327609
EUVD: 🔒
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 10/08/2025 12:58Updated: 12/12/2025 19:52
Changes: 10/08/2025 12:58 (59), 10/23/2025 06:27 (4), 10/23/2025 10:56 (1), 12/12/2025 19:52 (40)
Complete: 🔍
Submitter: crem
Committer: crem
Cache ID: 216:B7E:103
Submit
Accepted
- Submit #668005: wonderwhy-er DesktopCommanderMCP 0.2.13 OS Command Injection (by crem)
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.