BitchX 1.1-final MODE memory corruption

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
6.8$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in BitchX 1.1-final. Affected is an unknown function. This manipulation of the argument MODE causes memory corruption. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2007-4584. Moreover, an exploit is present. The affected component should be disabled.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability classified as critical was found in BitchX 1.1-final. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation of the argument MODE with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:

Stack-based buffer overflow in BitchX 1.1 Final allows remote IRC servers to execute arbitrary code via a long string in a MODE command, related to the p_mode variable.

The bug was discovered 08/27/2007. The weakness was disclosed 08/28/2007 by bannedit (Website). The advisory is shared at exploit-db.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2007-4584 since 08/28/2007. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details and also a public exploit are known.

A public exploit has been developed by bannedit and been published before and not just after the advisory. It is possible to download the exploit at exploit-db.com. It is declared as functional. The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 1 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $25k-$100k. The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 33558 (GLSA-200807-12 : BitchX: Multiple vulnerabilities), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family Gentoo Local Security Checks and running in the context l.

The best possible mitigation is suggested to be disabling the affected component. A possible mitigation has been published 12 months after the disclosure of the vulnerability.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (36306), Exploit-DB (4321), Tenable (33558), SecurityFocus (BID 25462†) and OSVDB (37480†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Name

Version

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.8

VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.8
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Memory corruption
CWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Functional
Author: bannedit
Download: 🔍

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Nessus ID: 33558
Nessus Name: GLSA-200807-12 : BitchX: Multiple vulnerabilities
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
Nessus Context: 🔍
Nessus Port: 🔍

OpenVAS ID: 61387
OpenVAS Name: Gentoo Security Advisory GLSA 200807-12 (bitchx)
OpenVAS File: 🔍
OpenVAS Family: 🔍

Exploit-DB: 🔍

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Disable
Status: 🔍

Reaction Time: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exposure Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

08/27/2007 🔍
08/27/2007 +0 days 🔍
08/27/2007 +0 days 🔍
08/27/2007 +0 days 🔍
08/27/2007 +0 days 🔍
08/28/2007 +1 days 🔍
08/28/2007 +0 days 🔍
08/28/2007 +0 days 🔍
08/28/2007 +0 days 🔍
09/03/2007 +5 days 🔍
07/21/2008 +322 days 🔍
07/23/2008 +2 days 🔍
07/28/2008 +5 days 🔍
10/01/2024 +5909 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: exploit-db.com
Researcher: bannedit
Status: Confirmed

CVE: CVE-2007-4584 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2007-4584
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-3277
X-Force: 36306 - BitchX p_mode function buffer overflow, High Risk
SecurityFocus: 25462 - BitchX IRC MODE Remote Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
Secunia: 31180 - Gentoo BitchX Multiple Vulnerabilities, Highly Critical
OSVDB: 37480 - BitchX IRC Client MODE Command Remote Overflow
Vulnerability Center: 18945 - BitchX Buffer Overflow Vulnerability Allows Remote IRC Servers Code Execution or DoS, High
Vupen: ADV-2007-2994

scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013

Entryinfo

Created: 09/03/2007 18:13
Updated: 10/01/2024 06:36
Changes: 09/03/2007 18:13 (98), 08/14/2019 22:35 (1), 10/01/2024 06:36 (17)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

Interested in the pricing of exploits?

See the underground prices here!