Fortinet FortiVoice up to 6.4.10/7.0.6/7.2.0 HTTP/HTTPS/CLI os command injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Fortinet FortiVoice up to 6.4.10/7.0.6/7.2.0. This impacts an unknown function of the component HTTP/HTTPS/CLI. The manipulation results in os command injection. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2025-47856. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Fortinet FortiVoice up to 6.4.10/7.0.6/7.2.0. Affected is some unknown functionality of the component HTTP/HTTPS/CLI. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a os command injection vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-78. The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. CVE summarizes:
Two improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerabilities [CWE-78] in Fortinet FortiVoice version 7.2.0, 7.0.0 through 7.0.6 and before 6.4.10 allows a privileged attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via crafted HTTP/HTTPS or CLI requests.
The advisory is shared for download at fortiguard.fortinet.com. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2025-47856 since 05/12/2025. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploitation requires an enhanced level of successful authentication. There are neither technical details nor an exploit publicly available. The current price for an exploit might be approx. USD $0-$5k (estimation calculated on 10/14/2025). The MITRE ATT&CK project declares the attack technique as T1202.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
- 6.4.0
- 6.4.1
- 6.4.2
- 6.4.3
- 6.4.4
- 6.4.5
- 6.4.6
- 6.4.7
- 6.4.8
- 6.4.9
- 6.4.10
- 7.0
- 7.0.0
- 7.0.1
- 7.0.2
- 7.0.3
- 7.0.4
- 7.0.5
- 7.0.6
- 7.1
- 7.2.0
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.fortinet.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.2VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.2
VulDB Base Score: 7.2
VulDB Temp Score: 7.2
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.2
CNA Vector (fortinet): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Os command injectionCWE: CWE-78 / CWE-77 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
05/12/2025 CVE reserved10/14/2025 Advisory disclosed
10/14/2025 VulDB entry created
10/14/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Vendor: fortinet.comAdvisory: FG-IR-25-250
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2025-47856 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-47856
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-328260
Entry
Created: 10/14/2025 15:59Changes: 10/14/2025 15:59 (63)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.