Microsoft Windows 11 24H2/11 25H2/Server 2022 23H2/Server 2025 Local Session Manager improper validation of specified type of input
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Microsoft Windows 11 24H2/11 25H2/Server 2022 23H2/Server 2025. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component Local Session Manager. Performing a manipulation results in improper validation of specified type of input. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2025-59257. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available. Applying a patch is the recommended action to fix this issue.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Microsoft Windows 11 24H2/11 25H2/Server 2022 23H2/Server 2025. It has been classified as critical. This affects an unknown function of the component Local Session Manager. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a improper validation of specified type of input vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-1287. The product receives input that is expected to be of a certain type, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input is actually of the expected type. This is going to have an impact on availability. The summary by CVE is:
Improper validation of specified type of input in Windows Local Session Manager (LSM) allows an authorized attacker to deny service over a network.
The weakness was released 10/14/2025 as confirmed security update guide (Website). The advisory is shared at msrc.microsoft.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-59257. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 10/21/2025).
Applying a patch is able to eliminate this problem. A possible mitigation has been published immediately after the disclosure of the vulnerability.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.microsoft.com/
- Product: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Base Score: 6.5
VulDB Temp Score: 5.7
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Vendor Base Score (Microsoft): 6.5
Vendor Vector (Microsoft): 🔒
CNA Base Score: 6.5
CNA Vector (Microsoft): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Improper validation of specified type of inputCWE: CWE-1287 / CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Unproven
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: PatchStatus: 🔍
Reaction Time: 🔒
0-Day Time: 🔒
Exposure Time: 🔒
Timeline
10/14/2025 VulDB entry created10/14/2025 Advisory disclosed
10/14/2025 Countermeasure disclosed
10/21/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Vendor: microsoft.comProduct: microsoft.com
Advisory: msrc.microsoft.com
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2025-59257 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-59257
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-328461
Entry
Created: 10/14/2025 20:14Updated: 10/21/2025 02:44
Changes: 10/14/2025 20:14 (35), 10/14/2025 20:17 (34), 10/21/2025 02:44 (11)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.