projectworlds Expense Management System 1.0 Roles Page create cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in projectworlds Expense Management System 1.0 and classified as problematic. This impacts an unknown function of the file /public/admin/roles/create of the component Roles Page. This manipulation causes cross site scripting. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-12229. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Furthermore, there is an exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in projectworlds Expense Management System 1.0 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown part of the file /public/admin/roles/create of the component Roles Page. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. As an impact it is known to affect integrity.
It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2025-12229. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. Additional levels of successful authentication are needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details and also a public exploit are known. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1059.007 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
It is possible to download the exploit at github.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2025-36082). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.2VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.1
VulDB Base Score: 2.4
VulDB Temp Score: 2.2
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 4.8
NVD Vector: 🔒
CNA Base Score: 2.4
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔒
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
10/25/2025 Advisory disclosed10/25/2025 VulDB entry created
10/28/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-12229 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-12229
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-329899
EUVD: 🔒
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 10/25/2025 19:05Updated: 10/28/2025 08:02
Changes: 10/25/2025 19:05 (56), 10/27/2025 07:25 (1), 10/27/2025 08:11 (30), 10/28/2025 08:02 (11)
Complete: 🔍
Submitter: LINXI666
Cache ID: 216::103
Submit
Accepted
- Submit #673706: projectworlds Expense Management System v1.0 Critical Persistent Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (by LINXI666)
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.