Crypto Payment Gateway with Payeer for WooCommerce Plugin Order Status Remote Code Execution
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as critical has been detected in Crypto Payment Gateway with Payeer for WooCommerce Plugin up to 1.0.3 on WordPress. This impacts an unknown function of the component Order Status Handler. This manipulation causes Remote Code Execution. This vulnerability is registered as CVE-2025-11890. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Crypto Payment Gateway with Payeer for WooCommerce Plugin up to 1.0.3 on WordPress. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is some unknown functionality of the component Order Status Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a remote code execution vulnerability. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
It is possible to read the advisory at wordfence.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2025-11890. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 11/03/2025).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.1
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Remote Code ExecutionCWE: Unknown
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
11/03/2025 Advisory disclosed11/03/2025 VulDB entry created
11/03/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: wordfence.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-11890 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-11890
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-330955
Entry
Created: 11/03/2025 19:04Changes: 11/03/2025 19:04 (50)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.