Django up to 4.2.25/5.1.13/5.2.7 on Windows algorithmic complexity

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
4.1$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability was found in Django up to 4.2.25/5.1.13/5.2.7 on Windows. It has been classified as problematic. This affects the function Django.http.HttpResponseRedirect/Django.http.HttpResponsePermanentRedirect. This manipulation causes algorithmic complexity. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2025-64458. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Django up to 4.2.25/5.1.13/5.2.7 on Windows. Affected by this vulnerability is the function Django.http.HttpResponseRedirect/Django.http.HttpResponsePermanentRedirect. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a algorithmic complexity vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-407. An algorithm in a product has an inefficient worst-case computational complexity that may be detrimental to system performance and can be triggered by an attacker, typically using crafted manipulations that ensure that the worst case is being reached. As an impact it is known to affect availability. The summary by CVE is:

An issue was discovered in 5.1 before 5.1.14, 4.2 before 4.2.26, and 5.2 before 5.2.8. NFKC normalization in Python is slow on Windows. As a consequence, `django.http.HttpResponseRedirect`, `django.http.HttpResponsePermanentRedirect`, and the shortcut `django.shortcuts.redirect` were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Seokchan Yoon for reporting this issue.

The advisory is shared at docs.djangoproject.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2025-64458 since 11/04/2025. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1499 for this issue.

The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 274082 (Linux Distros Unpatched Vulnerability : CVE-2025-64458), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment.

Upgrading to version 4.2.26, 5.1.14 or 5.2.8 eliminates this vulnerability. The upgrade is hosted for download at docs.djangoproject.com.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Tenable (274082), EUVD (EUVD-2025-37765) and CERT Bund (WID-SEC-2025-2495). Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.

Affected

  • Debian Linux
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux
  • Fedora Linux
  • SUSE Linux
  • SUSE openSUSE
  • Open Source Django

Productinfo

Type

Name

Version

License

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.1

VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Algorithmic complexity
CWE: CWE-407 / CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Nessus ID: 274082
Nessus Name: Linux Distros Unpatched Vulnerability : CVE-2025-64458

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Upgrade
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔒

Upgrade: Django 4.2.26/5.1.14/5.2.8

Timelineinfo

11/04/2025 CVE reserved
11/05/2025 +1 days Advisory disclosed
11/05/2025 +0 days VulDB entry created
12/30/2025 +55 days VulDB entry last update

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: docs.djangoproject.com
Status: Confirmed

CVE: CVE-2025-64458 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-64458
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-331273
EUVD: 🔒
CERT Bund: WID-SEC-2025-2495 - Django: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service und SQL-Injection

Entryinfo

Created: 11/05/2025 17:58
Updated: 12/30/2025 23:33
Changes: 11/05/2025 17:58 (57), 11/05/2025 23:09 (1), 11/06/2025 12:49 (2), 11/07/2025 09:56 (7), 11/18/2025 04:02 (1), 12/30/2025 23:33 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

Do you need the next level of professionalism?

Upgrade your account now!