Django up to 4.2.25/5.1.13/5.2.7 on Windows algorithmic complexity
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Django up to 4.2.25/5.1.13/5.2.7 on Windows. It has been classified as problematic. This affects the function Django.http.HttpResponseRedirect/Django.http.HttpResponsePermanentRedirect. This manipulation causes algorithmic complexity.
This vulnerability appears as CVE-2025-64458. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Django up to 4.2.25/5.1.13/5.2.7 on Windows. Affected by this vulnerability is the function Django.http.HttpResponseRedirect/Django.http.HttpResponsePermanentRedirect. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a algorithmic complexity vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-407. An algorithm in a product has an inefficient worst-case computational complexity that may be detrimental to system performance and can be triggered by an attacker, typically using crafted manipulations that ensure that the worst case is being reached. As an impact it is known to affect availability. The summary by CVE is:
An issue was discovered in 5.1 before 5.1.14, 4.2 before 4.2.26, and 5.2 before 5.2.8. NFKC normalization in Python is slow on Windows. As a consequence, `django.http.HttpResponseRedirect`, `django.http.HttpResponsePermanentRedirect`, and the shortcut `django.shortcuts.redirect` were subject to a potential denial-of-service attack via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Seokchan Yoon for reporting this issue.
The advisory is shared at docs.djangoproject.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2025-64458 since 11/04/2025. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1499 for this issue.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 274082 (Linux Distros Unpatched Vulnerability : CVE-2025-64458), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment.
Upgrading to version 4.2.26, 5.1.14 or 5.2.8 eliminates this vulnerability. The upgrade is hosted for download at docs.djangoproject.com.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Tenable (274082), EUVD (EUVD-2025-37765) and CERT Bund (WID-SEC-2025-2495). Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Affected
- Debian Linux
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux
- Fedora Linux
- SUSE Linux
- SUSE openSUSE
- Open Source Django
Product
Type
Name
Version
- 4.2.0
- 4.2.1
- 4.2.2
- 4.2.3
- 4.2.4
- 4.2.5
- 4.2.6
- 4.2.7
- 4.2.8
- 4.2.9
- 4.2.10
- 4.2.11
- 4.2.12
- 4.2.13
- 4.2.14
- 4.2.15
- 4.2.16
- 4.2.17
- 4.2.18
- 4.2.19
- 4.2.20
- 4.2.21
- 4.2.22
- 4.2.23
- 4.2.24
- 4.2.25
- 5.1.0
- 5.1.1
- 5.1.2
- 5.1.3
- 5.1.4
- 5.1.5
- 5.1.6
- 5.1.7
- 5.1.8
- 5.1.9
- 5.1.10
- 5.1.11
- 5.1.12
- 5.1.13
- 5.2.0
- 5.2.1
- 5.2.2
- 5.2.3
- 5.2.4
- 5.2.5
- 5.2.6
- 5.2.7
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Algorithmic complexityCWE: CWE-407 / CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 274082
Nessus Name: Linux Distros Unpatched Vulnerability : CVE-2025-64458
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Upgrade: Django 4.2.26/5.1.14/5.2.8
Timeline
11/04/2025 CVE reserved11/05/2025 Advisory disclosed
11/05/2025 VulDB entry created
12/30/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: docs.djangoproject.comStatus: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2025-64458 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-64458
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-331273
EUVD: 🔒
CERT Bund: WID-SEC-2025-2495 - Django: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service und SQL-Injection
Entry
Created: 11/05/2025 17:58Updated: 12/30/2025 23:33
Changes: 11/05/2025 17:58 (57), 11/05/2025 23:09 (1), 11/06/2025 12:49 (2), 11/07/2025 09:56 (7), 11/18/2025 04:02 (1), 12/30/2025 23:33 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.