| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in python-kdcproxy. Impacted is an unknown function of the component TCP Upstream Handler. Performing a manipulation results in denial of service. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2025-59089. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in python-kdcproxy (version now known). It has been classified as problematic. This affects some unknown processing of the component TCP Upstream Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a denial of service vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-404. The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use. This is going to have an impact on availability. The summary by CVE is:
If an attacker causes kdcproxy to connect to an attacker-controlled KDC server (e.g. through server-side request forgery), they can exploit the fact that kdcproxy does not enforce bounds on TCP response length to conduct a denial-of-service attack. While receiving the KDC's response, kdcproxy copies the entire buffered stream into a new buffer on each recv() call, even when the transfer is incomplete, causing excessive memory allocation and CPU usage. Additionally, kdcproxy accepts incoming response chunks as long as the received data length is not exactly equal to the length indicated in the response header, even when individual chunks or the total buffer exceed the maximum length of a Kerberos message. This allows an attacker to send unbounded data until the connection timeout is reached (approximately 12 seconds), exhausting server memory or CPU resources. Multiple concurrent requests can cause accept queue overflow, denying service to legitimate clients.
The advisory is shared at bugzilla.redhat.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-59089. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1499 for this issue.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 275245 (RHEL 9 : python-kdcproxy (RHSA-2025:21139)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Tenable (275245), EUVD (EUVD-2025-131919) and CERT Bund (WID-SEC-2025-2586). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Affected
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux
- Fedora Linux
- Oracle Linux
Product
Type
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.1VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 5.9
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Denial of serviceCWE: CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 275245
Nessus Name: RHEL 9 : python-kdcproxy (RHSA-2025:21139)
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
11/12/2025 Advisory disclosed11/12/2025 VulDB entry created
11/21/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: bugzilla.redhat.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-59089 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-59089
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-332205
EUVD: 🔒
CERT Bund: WID-SEC-2025-2586 - Red Hat Enterprise Linux (python-kdcproxy): Mehrere Schwachstellen
Entry
Created: 11/12/2025 16:45Updated: 11/21/2025 00:55
Changes: 11/12/2025 16:45 (49), 11/12/2025 22:39 (1), 11/13/2025 05:02 (12), 11/13/2025 10:41 (2), 11/16/2025 19:01 (7), 11/17/2025 19:31 (1), 11/21/2025 00:55 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.