D-Link DWR-M920/DWR-M921/DWR-M960/DIR-822K/DIR-825M 1.01.07 formTracerouteDiagnosticRun host buffer overflow
Summary
A vulnerability was found in D-Link DWR-M920, DWR-M921, DWR-M960, DIR-822K and DIR-825M 1.01.07. It has been classified as critical. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /boafrm/formTracerouteDiagnosticRun. The manipulation of the argument host leads to buffer overflow. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2025-13305. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. Furthermore, an exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in D-Link DWR-M920, DWR-M921, DWR-M960, DIR-822K and DIR-825M 1.01.07 and classified as critical. This issue affects an unknown code block of the file /boafrm/formTracerouteDiagnosticRun. The manipulation of the argument host with an unknown input leads to a buffer overflow vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-120. The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer, leading to a buffer overflow. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
The advisory is shared at github.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-13305. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. Technical details as well as a public exploit are known. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 12/08/2025).
The exploit is available at github.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.dlink.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 9.1VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.9
VulDB Base Score: 8.8
VulDB Temp Score: 8.0
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔒
CNA Base Score: 8.8
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Buffer overflowCWE: CWE-120 / CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔒
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
11/17/2025 Advisory disclosed11/17/2025 VulDB entry created
12/08/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Vendor: dlink.comAdvisory: github.com
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-13305 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-13305
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-332645
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 11/17/2025 15:17Updated: 12/08/2025 15:40
Changes: 11/17/2025 15:17 (56), 11/17/2025 15:22 (4), 11/18/2025 08:18 (31), 12/08/2025 15:40 (11)
Complete: 🔍
Submitter: LX-LX
Cache ID: 216::103
Submit
Accepted
- Submit #691809: D-Link DWR-M960 V1.01.07 Buffer Overflow (by LX-LX)
Duplicate
- Submit #XXXXXX: X-xxxx Xxx-xxxx Xx.x.x Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx (by LX-LX)
- Submit #XXXXXX: X-xxxx Xxx-xxxx Xx_x.xx_xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx (by hhsw34)
- Submit #XXXXXX: X-xxxx Xxx-xxxx Xx.x.xx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx (by hhsw34)
- Submit #XXXXXX: X-xxxx Xxx-xxxx Xx.x.xx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx (by LINXI666)
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.