Bridgetech VB220/VB120/VB330/VB440 6.5.0-9 /probe/core/setup/passwd information disclosure
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Bridgetech VB220, VB120, VB330 and VB440 6.5.0-9. It has been rated as problematic. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /probe/core/setup/passwd. Performing a manipulation results in information disclosure. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2025-63205. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Bridgetech VB220, VB120, VB330 and VB440 6.5.0-9. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown function of the file /probe/core/setup/passwd. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a information disclosure vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-200. The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality. The summary by CVE is:
An issue was discovered in bridgetech probes VB220 IP Network Probe,VB120 Embedded IP + RF Probe, VB330 High-Capacity Probe, VB440 ST 2110 Production Analytics Probe, and NOMAD, firmware versions 6.5.0-9, allowing attackers to gain sensitive information such as administrator passwords via the /probe/core/setup/passwd endpoint. NOTE: the Supplier disagrees that 6.5.0-9 is affected, and instead reports that 5.6.0-3 and earlier are affected, and 5.6.0-4 (2020-09-21) and later are fixed.
This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-63205 since 10/27/2025. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1592 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Information disclosureCWE: CWE-200 / CWE-284 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
10/27/2025 CVE reserved11/19/2025 Advisory disclosed
11/19/2025 VulDB entry created
02/03/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Status: Not definedCVE: CVE-2025-63205 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-63205
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-332997
Entry
Created: 11/19/2025 19:52Updated: 02/03/2026 18:17
Changes: 11/19/2025 19:52 (52), 02/03/2026 18:17 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.