OpenFGA up to 1.11.0 ListObject Call improper authorization
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.6 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as critical has been reported in OpenFGA up to 1.11.0. This affects an unknown function of the component ListObject Call Handler. Performing a manipulation results in improper authorization. This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2025-64751. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in OpenFGA up to 1.11.0. This affects an unknown code of the component ListObject Call Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a improper authorization vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-285. The product does not perform or incorrectly performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
OpenFGA is a high-performance and flexible authorization/permission engine built for developers and inspired by Google Zanzibar. OpenFGA v1.4.0 to v1.11.0 ( openfga-0.1.34 <= Helm chart <= openfga-0.2.48, v.1.4.0 <= docker <= v.1.11.0) are vulnerable to improper policy enforcement when certain Check and ListObject calls are executed. This issue has been patched in version 1.11.1.
It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-64751 since 11/10/2025. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1548.002 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 279356 (SUSE SLES15 / openSUSE 15 Security Update : grafana (SUSE-SU-2025:4482-1)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment.
Upgrading to version 1.11.1 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Tenable (279356) and EUVD (EUVD-2025-198364). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Name
Version
Website
- Product: https://github.com/openfga/openfga/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.6
VulDB Base Score: 8.8
VulDB Temp Score: 8.4
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 8.8
NVD Vector: 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Improper authorizationCWE: CWE-285 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 279356
Nessus Name: SUSE SLES15 / openSUSE 15 Security Update : grafana (SUSE-SU-2025:4482-1)
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Upgrade: OpenFGA 1.11.1
Timeline
11/10/2025 CVE reserved11/21/2025 Advisory disclosed
11/21/2025 VulDB entry created
12/31/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: github.com
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2025-64751 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-64751
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-333099
EUVD: 🔒
Entry
Created: 11/21/2025 03:17Updated: 12/31/2025 18:16
Changes: 11/21/2025 03:17 (66), 11/28/2025 02:20 (1), 12/19/2025 16:31 (2), 12/31/2025 18:16 (10)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.