Panda ActiveScan 5.0/5.53.00 ActiveX Control memory corruption
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Panda ActiveScan 5.0/5.53.00. It has been classified as critical. The affected element is an unknown function of the component ActiveX Control. This manipulation causes memory corruption. This vulnerability is registered as CVE-2006-5967. No exploit is available. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Panda ActiveScan 5.0/5.53.00. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code block of the component ActiveX Control. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Race condition in Panda ActiveScan 5.53.00, and other versions before 5.54.01, allows remote attackers to cause memory corruption and execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors related to multiple invocations of the Analizar method in the ActiveScan.1 ActiveX control, which is not thread safe.
The weakness was published 11/17/2006 by Andreas Sandblad with Secunia Research (Website). The advisory is shared at secunia.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2006-5967 since 11/17/2006. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
It is declared as proof-of-concept.
Upgrading to version 5.53.00 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (30319), SecurityFocus (BID 21132†) and Secunia (SA21763†). Similar entry is available at VDB-33324. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.4
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Memory corruptionCWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Proof-of-Concept
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: ActiveScan 5.53.00
Timeline
11/15/2006 🔍11/16/2006 🔍
11/17/2006 🔍
11/17/2006 🔍
11/17/2006 🔍
03/12/2015 🔍
08/08/2018 🔍
Sources
Advisory: secunia.com⛔Researcher: Andreas Sandblad
Organization: Secunia Research
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2006-5967 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2006-5967
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-33325
X-Force: 30319 - Panda ActiveScan Activescan.1 ActiveX control code execution
SecurityFocus: 21132 - Panda ActiveScan ActiveX Controls Multiple Remote Vulnerabilities
Secunia: 21763 - Panda ActiveScan Multiple Vulnerabilities, Highly Critical
Vupen: ADV-2006-4536
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/12/2015 22:21Updated: 08/08/2018 07:11
Changes: 03/12/2015 22:21 (62), 08/08/2018 07:11 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:922:103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.