Django up to 4.2.26/5.1.14/5.2.8 algorithmic complexity
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Django up to 4.2.26/5.1.14/5.2.8. This affects an unknown part of the component django.core.serializers.xml_serializer.getInnerText. Performing a manipulation results in algorithmic complexity. This vulnerability was named CVE-2025-64460. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Django up to 4.2.26/5.1.14/5.2.8. This affects an unknown functionality of the component django.core.serializers.xml_serializer.getInnerText. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a algorithmic complexity vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-407. An algorithm in a product has an inefficient worst-case computational complexity that may be detrimental to system performance and can be triggered by an attacker, typically using crafted manipulations that ensure that the worst case is being reached. This is going to have an impact on availability. The summary by CVE is:
An issue was discovered in 5.2 before 5.2.9, 5.1 before 5.1.15, and 4.2 before 4.2.27. Algorithmic complexity in `django.core.serializers.xml_serializer.getInnerText()` allows a remote attacker to cause a potential denial-of-service attack triggering CPU and memory exhaustion via specially crafted XML input processed by the XML `Deserializer`. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Seokchan Yoon for reporting this issue.
It is possible to read the advisory at docs.djangoproject.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-64460 since 11/04/2025. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1499 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 277365 (Ubuntu 14.04 LTS / 16.04 LTS / 18.04 LTS / 20.04 LTS / 22.04 LTS / 24.04 LTS / 25.04 / 25.10 : Django vulnerabilities (USN-7903-1)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment.
Upgrading to version 4.2.27, 5.1.15 or 5.2.9 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Tenable (277365), EUVD (EUVD-2025-200248) and CERT Bund (WID-SEC-2025-2717). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Affected
- Debian Linux
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux
- Fedora Linux
- Ubuntu Linux
- SUSE Linux
- SUSE openSUSE
- Open Source Django
Product
Type
Name
Version
- 4.2.0
- 4.2.1
- 4.2.2
- 4.2.3
- 4.2.4
- 4.2.5
- 4.2.6
- 4.2.7
- 4.2.8
- 4.2.9
- 4.2.10
- 4.2.11
- 4.2.12
- 4.2.13
- 4.2.14
- 4.2.15
- 4.2.16
- 4.2.17
- 4.2.18
- 4.2.19
- 4.2.20
- 4.2.21
- 4.2.22
- 4.2.23
- 4.2.24
- 4.2.25
- 4.2.26
- 5.1.0
- 5.1.1
- 5.1.2
- 5.1.3
- 5.1.4
- 5.1.5
- 5.1.6
- 5.1.7
- 5.1.8
- 5.1.9
- 5.1.10
- 5.1.11
- 5.1.12
- 5.1.13
- 5.1.14
- 5.2.0
- 5.2.1
- 5.2.2
- 5.2.3
- 5.2.4
- 5.2.5
- 5.2.6
- 5.2.7
- 5.2.8
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Algorithmic complexityCWE: CWE-407 / CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 277365
Nessus Name: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS / 16.04 LTS / 18.04 LTS / 20.04 LTS / 22.04 LTS / 24.04 LTS / 25.04 / 25.10 : Django vulnerabilities (USN-7903-1)
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Upgrade: Django 4.2.27/5.1.15/5.2.9
Timeline
11/04/2025 CVE reserved12/02/2025 Advisory disclosed
12/02/2025 VulDB entry created
01/10/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: docs.djangoproject.comStatus: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2025-64460 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-64460
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-334083
EUVD: 🔒
CERT Bund: WID-SEC-2025-2717 - Django: Mehrere Schwachstellen
Entry
Created: 12/02/2025 16:35Updated: 01/10/2026 02:34
Changes: 12/02/2025 16:35 (55), 12/02/2025 17:25 (1), 12/04/2025 19:49 (2), 12/30/2025 12:14 (7), 01/10/2026 02:34 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.