STVS STVS ProVision 5.9.10 HTTP Request cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in STVS STVS ProVision 5.9.10. It has been classified as problematic. Impacted is an unknown function of the component HTTP Request Handler. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2021-47723. The attack can be initiated remotely. Additionally, an exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in STVS STVS ProVision 5.9.10. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown code block of the component HTTP Request Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
STVS ProVision 5.9.10 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform actions with administrative privileges by exploiting unvalidated HTTP requests. Attackers can visit malicious web sites to trigger the forge request, allowing them to create new admin users.
The weakness was released by Gjoko Krstic as 49482. It is possible to read the advisory at exploit-db.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2021-47723 since 12/07/2025. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available.
The exploit is shared for download at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at Exploit-DB (49482). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.6VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.4
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 3.9
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 8.8
NVD Vector: 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔒
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔒
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
12/07/2025 CVE reserved12/10/2025 Advisory disclosed
12/10/2025 VulDB entry created
02/17/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: 49482Researcher: Gjoko Krstic
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2021-47723 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2021-47723
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-335571
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 12/10/2025 08:08Updated: 02/17/2026 23:23
Changes: 12/10/2025 08:08 (71), 02/17/2026 23:23 (11)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:ADC:103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.