Meatmeet App on Android Bluetooth Low Energy improper authentication
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Meatmeet App on Android. It has been rated as critical. The affected element is an unknown function of the component Bluetooth Low Energy Handler. The manipulation leads to improper authentication. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2025-65824. The attack needs to be initiated within the local network. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Meatmeet App on Android (version unknown). It has been rated as critical. This issue affects an unknown function of the component Bluetooth Low Energy Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a improper authentication vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-287. When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
An unauthenticated attacker within proximity of the Meatmeet device can perform an unauthorized Over The Air (OTA) firmware upgrade using Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), resulting in the firmware on the device being overwritten with the attacker's code. As the device does not perform checks on upgrades, this results in Remote Code Execution (RCE) and the victim losing complete access to the Meatmeet.
The advisory is shared at github.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-65824 since 11/18/2025. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack needs to approached within the local network. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 12/11/2025).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.1
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Improper authenticationCWE: CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Partially
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
11/18/2025 CVE reserved12/11/2025 Advisory disclosed
12/11/2025 VulDB entry created
12/11/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-65824 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-65824
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-335825
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20130704
Entry
Created: 12/11/2025 07:34Changes: 12/11/2025 07:34 (53)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Submit
Duplicate
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.