D-Link DIR-803 up to 1.04 Configuration /getcfg.php AUTHORIZED_GROUP information disclosure
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in D-Link DIR-803 up to 1.04. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /getcfg.php of the component Configuration Handler. This manipulation of the argument AUTHORIZED_GROUP causes information disclosure. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-14528. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Furthermore, there is an exploit available. It is advisable to implement restrictive firewalling.
Details
A vulnerability was found in D-Link DIR-803 up to 1.04. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is some unknown functionality of the file /getcfg.php of the component Configuration Handler. The manipulation of the argument AUTHORIZED_GROUP with an unknown input leads to a information disclosure vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-200. The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality.
The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2025-14528. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details and also a public exploit are known. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1592 for this issue.
It is possible to download the exploit at github.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. By approaching the search of inurl:getcfg.php it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.
Proper firewalling of is able to address this issue.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Support
Website
- Vendor: https://www.dlink.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.0VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.8
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.7
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 7.5
NVD Vector: 🔒
CNA Base Score: 5.3
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Information disclosureCWE: CWE-200 / CWE-284 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔒
Google Hack: 🔒
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: FirewallStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
12/11/2025 Advisory disclosed12/11/2025 VulDB entry created
12/16/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Vendor: dlink.comAdvisory: github.com
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-14528 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-14528
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-335869
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 12/11/2025 09:45Updated: 12/16/2025 04:38
Changes: 12/11/2025 09:45 (59), 12/12/2025 10:10 (31), 12/16/2025 04:38 (11)
Complete: 🔍
Submitter: jiahui2888
Cache ID: 216::103
Submit
Accepted
- Submit #703150: D-Link DIR-803 1.04 and earlier Authorization Bypass (by github.com)
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.