NI LabVIEW up to 22.3.6/23.3.7/24.3.4/25.3.2 FindRsrcListEntry out-of-bounds
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in NI LabVIEW up to 22.3.6/23.3.7/24.3.4/25.3.2 and classified as critical. This affects the function LVResFile::FindRsrcListEntry. Performing a manipulation results in out-of-bounds.
This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2025-64467. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in NI LabVIEW up to 22.3.6/23.3.7/24.3.4/25.3.2. It has been classified as critical. This affects the function LVResFile::FindRsrcListEntry. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a out-of-bounds vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-125. The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
There is an out of bounds read vulnerability in NI LabVIEW in LVResFile::FindRsrcListEntry() when parsing a corrupted VI file. This vulnerability may result in information disclosure or arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted VI. This vulnerability affects NI LabVIEW 2025 Q3 (25.3) and prior versions.
The weakness was shared by Michael Heinzl. The advisory is shared at ni.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-64467 since 11/04/2025. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 12/18/2025).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
- 22.3.0
- 22.3.1
- 22.3.2
- 22.3.3
- 22.3.4
- 22.3.5
- 22.3.6
- 23.3.0
- 23.3.1
- 23.3.2
- 23.3.3
- 23.3.4
- 23.3.5
- 23.3.6
- 23.3.7
- 24.3.0
- 24.3.1
- 24.3.2
- 24.3.3
- 24.3.4
- 25.3.0
- 25.3.1
- 25.3.2
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.0VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.0
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.3
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.8
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Out-of-boundsCWE: CWE-125 / CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
11/04/2025 CVE reserved12/18/2025 Advisory disclosed
12/18/2025 VulDB entry created
12/18/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: ni.comResearcher: Michael Heinzl
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2025-64467 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-64467
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-337389
Entry
Created: 12/18/2025 17:21Changes: 12/18/2025 17:21 (74)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.