Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18 HTTP Request /goform/CheckTools ipaddress command injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.9 | $0-$5k | 0.38 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. It has been classified as critical. Affected is an unknown function of the file /goform/CheckTools of the component HTTP Request Handler. The manipulation of the argument ipaddress leads to command injection. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2025-15048. The attack may be initiated remotely. In addition, an exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. This issue affects an unknown code block of the file /goform/CheckTools of the component HTTP Request Handler. The manipulation of the argument ipaddress with an unknown input leads to a command injection vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-77. The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
The advisory is shared at github.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-15048. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details as well as a public exploit are known. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1202 for this issue.
The exploit is available at github.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2025-205022). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.tenda.com.cn/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.1VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.9
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.6
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔒
CNA Base Score: 7.3
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Command injectionCWE: CWE-77 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔒
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
12/23/2025 Advisory disclosed12/23/2025 VulDB entry created
12/31/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Vendor: tenda.com.cnAdvisory: github.com
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-15048 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-15048
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-337853
EUVD: 🔒
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 12/23/2025 15:20Updated: 12/31/2025 00:48
Changes: 12/23/2025 15:20 (57), 12/24/2025 02:40 (1), 12/25/2025 07:32 (30), 12/31/2025 00:48 (11)
Complete: 🔍
Submitter: z472421519
Cache ID: 216::103
Submit
Accepted
- Submit #720885: Tenda WH450 V1.0.0.18 Command Injection (by z472421519)
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.