ETAP Lighting International NV ETAP Safety Manager 1.0.0.32 GET Parameter action cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in ETAP Lighting International NV ETAP Safety Manager 1.0.0.32 and classified as problematic. The affected element is an unknown function of the component GET Parameter Handler. The manipulation of the argument action leads to cross site scripting. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2022-50802. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in ETAP Lighting International NV ETAP Safety Manager 1.0.0.32 and classified as problematic. This issue affects an unknown part of the component GET Parameter Handler. The manipulation of the argument action with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. Impacted is integrity. The summary by CVE is:
ETAP Safety Manager 1.0.0.32 contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability in the 'action' GET parameter that allows unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious HTML and JavaScript. Attackers can craft specially formed requests to execute arbitrary scripts in victim browser sessions, potentially stealing credentials or performing unauthorized actions.
The weakness was published by Gjoko Krstic as 168339. The advisory is shared at zeroscience.mk. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2022-50802 since 12/27/2025. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at X-Force (235743). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.2VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.1
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 6.1
CNA Vector (VulnCheck): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
12/27/2025 CVE reserved12/31/2025 Advisory disclosed
12/31/2025 VulDB entry created
12/31/2025 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: 168339Researcher: Gjoko Krstic
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2022-50802 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2022-50802
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-339125
X-Force: 235743
Entry
Created: 12/31/2025 04:08Changes: 12/31/2025 04:08 (78)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.