Safetica Endpoint Client Kernel Driver ProcessMonitorDriver.sys denial of service
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Safetica Endpoint Client. It has been rated as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality in the library ProcessMonitorDriver.sys of the component Kernel Driver. The manipulation leads to denial of service. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-0828. Local access is required to approach this attack. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Safetica Endpoint Client (version unknown). This issue affects an unknown function in the library ProcessMonitorDriver.sys of the component Kernel Driver. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a denial of service vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-404. The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use. Impacted is availability.
The advisory is shared at kb.cert.org. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2026-0828. The exploitation is known to be easy. An attack has to be approached locally. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.5
VulDB Base Score: 5.5
VulDB Temp Score: 5.5
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Denial of serviceCWE: CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
01/20/2026 Advisory disclosed01/20/2026 VulDB entry created
01/20/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: kb.cert.orgStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-0828 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-0828
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-341957
Entry
Created: 01/20/2026 15:33Changes: 01/20/2026 15:33 (50), 01/20/2026 15:34 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.