adamlabs Photo Gallery Plugin up to 1.1.0 on WordPress cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in adamlabs Photo Gallery Plugin up to 1.1.0 on WordPress. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2025-53240. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in adamlabs Photo Gallery Plugin up to 1.1.0 on WordPress and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. Impacted is integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in adamlabs WordPress Photo Gallery photo-gallery-portfolio allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects WordPress Photo Gallery: from n/a through <= 1.1.0.
The weakness was published by Nguyen Xuan Chien. The advisory is shared at patchstack.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-53240 since 06/27/2025. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
06/27/2025 CVE reserved01/22/2026 Advisory disclosed
01/22/2026 VulDB entry created
01/22/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: patchstack.comResearcher: Nguyen Xuan Chien
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-53240 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-53240
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-342365
Entry
Created: 01/22/2026 19:08Changes: 01/22/2026 19:08 (55)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.