Dormakaba Access Manager 92xx-k7 Web Server least privilege violation
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.7 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Dormakaba Access Manager 92xx-k7. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component Web Server. This manipulation causes least privilege violation. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-59106. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in Dormakaba Access Manager 92xx-k7 (version now known) and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is some unknown processing of the component Web Server. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a least privilege violation vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-272. The elevated privilege level required to perform operations such as chroot() should be dropped immediately after the operation is performed. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
The binary serving the web server and executing basically all actions launched from the Web UI is running with root privileges. This is against the least privilege principle. If an attacker is able to execute code on the system via other vulnerabilities it is possible to directly execute commands with highest privileges.
The weakness was shared by Clemens Stockenreitner and Werner Schober. It is possible to read the advisory at r.sec-consult.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2025-59106 since 09/09/2025. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The attack can be launched remotely. Additional levels of successful authentication are needed for exploitation. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 02/12/2026). The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1068 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.7
VulDB Base Score: 6.6
VulDB Temp Score: 6.6
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
ADP CISA Base Score: 8.8
ADP CISA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Least privilege violationCWE: CWE-272 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
09/09/2025 CVE reserved01/26/2026 Advisory disclosed
01/26/2026 VulDB entry created
02/12/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: r.sec-consult.comResearcher: Clemens Stockenreitner, Werner Schober
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-59106 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-59106
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-342859
Entry
Created: 01/26/2026 11:52Updated: 02/12/2026 18:10
Changes: 01/26/2026 11:52 (53), 02/12/2026 18:10 (11)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.