Webcompanion Adaware Web Companion version 4.8.2078.3950 unquoted search path
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability described as problematic has been identified in Webcompanion Adaware Web Companion version 4.8.2078.3950. This vulnerability affects unknown code. Such manipulation leads to unquoted search path. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2019-25287. The attack must be carried out locally. In addition, an exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Webcompanion Adaware Web Companion version 4.8.2078.3950. Affected by this issue is an unknown code block. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a unquoted search path vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-428. The product uses a search path that contains an unquoted element, in which the element contains whitespace or other separators. This can cause the product to access resources in a parent path. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. CVE summarizes:
Adaware Web Companion version 4.8.2078.3950 contains an unquoted service path vulnerability in the WCAssistantService that allows local users to potentially execute code with elevated privileges. Attackers can exploit the unquoted path in C:\Program Files (x86)\Lavasoft\Web Companion\Application\ to inject malicious code that would execute with LocalSystem privileges during service startup.
The weakness was presented by Mariela L Martínez Hdez as 47597. The advisory is shared for download at exploit-db.com. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2019-25287 since 01/06/2026. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The attack needs to be approached locally. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available. The MITRE ATT&CK project declares the attack technique as T1574.009.
The exploit is available at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at Exploit-DB (47597). Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.1
VulDB Base Score: 7.0
VulDB Temp Score: 6.4
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.8
CNA Vector (VulnCheck): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Unquoted search pathCWE: CWE-428 / CWE-426
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔒
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔒
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔒
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
01/06/2026 CVE reserved02/05/2026 Advisory disclosed
02/05/2026 VulDB entry created
02/05/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: 47597Researcher: Mariela L Martínez Hdez
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2019-25287 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2019-25287
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-344468
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 02/05/2026 08:01Changes: 02/05/2026 08:01 (79)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.