code-projects Online Reviewer System 1.0 btn_functions.php firstname cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in code-projects Online Reviewer System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /system/system/admins/manage/users/btn_functions.php. This manipulation of the argument firstname causes cross site scripting. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2026-2224. The attack can be initiated remotely. Additionally, an exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in code-projects Online Reviewer System 1.0. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is some unknown functionality of the file /system/system/admins/manage/users/btn_functions.php. The manipulation of the argument firstname with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. As an impact it is known to affect integrity.
The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-2224. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details and also a public exploit are known. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
It is possible to download the exploit at github.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. By approaching the search of inurl:system/system/admins/manage/users/btn_functions.php it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://code-projects.org/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.1VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.0
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.2
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 5.4
NVD Vector: 🔒
CNA Base Score: 3.5
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔒
Google Hack: 🔒
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
02/08/2026 Advisory disclosed02/08/2026 VulDB entry created
02/11/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Vendor: code-projects.orgAdvisory: github.com
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-2224 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-2224
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-344941
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 02/08/2026 17:05Updated: 02/11/2026 11:09
Changes: 02/08/2026 17:05 (56), 02/09/2026 11:07 (30), 02/11/2026 11:09 (11)
Complete: 🔍
Submitter: SHU for security
Cache ID: 216::103
Submit
Accepted
- Submit #750028: code-projects Online Reviewer System V1 Cross Site Scripting (by SHU for security)
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.