| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Django 0.95. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to privilege escalation. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2007-0405. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Django 0.95 (Content Management System). This issue affects an unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a privilege escalation vulnerability. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
The LazyUser class in the AuthenticationMiddleware for Django 0.95 does not properly cache the user name across requests, which allows remote authenticated users to gain the privileges of a different user.
The weakness was presented 01/22/2007 (Website). The advisory is shared at secunia.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2007-0405 since 01/22/2007. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. The successful exploitation needs a simple authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (31628), SecurityFocus (BID 22138†) and Secunia (SA23826†). See VDB-34552 for similar entry. Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.3
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Privilege escalationCWE: Unknown
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
01/18/2007 🔍01/19/2007 🔍
01/22/2007 🔍
01/22/2007 🔍
01/22/2007 🔍
03/13/2015 🔍
08/17/2018 🔍
Sources
Advisory: secunia.com⛔Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2007-0405 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2007-0405
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-34553
X-Force: 31628
SecurityFocus: 22138 - Django Authentication Bypass Weakness
Secunia: 23826 - Django Two Vulnerabilities, Moderately Critical
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/13/2015 10:40Updated: 08/17/2018 07:19
Changes: 03/13/2015 10:40 (47), 08/17/2018 07:19 (7)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.