| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in PGST PF-50 1.2. It has been rated as critical. The impacted element is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to authentication replay. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-67135. The attack can only be initiated within the local network. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in PGST PF-50 1.2. This issue affects an unknown function. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a authentication replay vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-294. A capture-replay flaw exists when the design of the product makes it possible for a malicious user to sniff network traffic and bypass authentication by replaying it to the server in question to the same effect as the original message (or with minor changes). Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Weak Security in the PF-50 1.2 keyfob of PGST PG107 Alarm System 1.25.05.hf allows attackers to compromise access control via a code replay attack.
The advisory is shared at neutsec.io. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2025-67135 since 12/08/2025. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The attack needs to approached within the local network. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 02/13/2026). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1040 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.4
VulDB Base Score: 5.0
VulDB Temp Score: 5.0
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
ADP CISA Base Score: 9.8
ADP CISA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Authentication replayCWE: CWE-294 / CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Partially
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
12/08/2025 CVE reserved02/12/2026 Advisory disclosed
02/12/2026 VulDB entry created
02/13/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: neutsec.ioStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-67135 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-67135
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-345737
Entry
Created: 02/12/2026 07:02Updated: 02/13/2026 04:55
Changes: 02/12/2026 07:02 (52), 02/13/2026 04:55 (11)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.