MaysWind ezBookkeeping up to 1.2.0 File Import resource consumption
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in MaysWind ezBookkeeping up to 1.2.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component File Import. Performing a manipulation results in resource consumption. This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2025-65519. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in MaysWind ezBookkeeping up to 1.2.0. This affects an unknown code of the component File Import. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a resource consumption vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-400. The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource, thereby enabling an actor to influence the amount of resources consumed, eventually leading to the exhaustion of available resources. This is going to have an impact on availability. The summary by CVE is:
mayswind ezbookkeeping versions 1.2.0 and earlier contain a critical vulnerability in JSON and XML file import processing. The application fails to validate nesting depth during parsing operations, allowing authenticated attackers to trigger denial of service conditions by uploading deeply nested malicious files. This results in CPU exhaustion, service degradation, or complete service unavailability.
The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-65519 since 11/18/2025. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1499 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.3
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.2
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
ADP CISA Base Score: 6.5
ADP CISA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Resource consumptionCWE: CWE-400 / CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
11/18/2025 CVE reserved02/18/2026 Advisory disclosed
02/18/2026 VulDB entry created
02/21/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-65519 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-65519
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-346581
Entry
Created: 02/18/2026 18:41Updated: 02/21/2026 18:45
Changes: 02/18/2026 18:41 (62), 02/21/2026 18:45 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.