Cdome Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 Dnsmasq Endpoint cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in Cdome Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component Dnsmasq Endpoint. Performing a manipulation of the argument TRANSPARENT_SOURCE_BYPASS/TRANSPARENT_DESTINATION_BYPASS results in cross site scripting. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2019-25426. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. Furthermore, an exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Cdome Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown code of the component Dnsmasq Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument TRANSPARENT_SOURCE_BYPASS/TRANSPARENT_DESTINATION_BYPASS with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting crafted input to the dnsmasq endpoint. Attackers can send POST requests with script payloads in the TRANSPARENT_SOURCE_BYPASS or TRANSPARENT_DESTINATION_BYPASS parameters to execute arbitrary JavaScript in users' browsers.
The weakness was published by Ozer Goker as 46408. It is possible to read the advisory at exploit-db.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2019-25426 since 02/18/2026. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details and a public exploit are known. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1059.007 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
The exploit is shared for download at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.2VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.0
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 3.9
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 6.1
CNA Vector (VulnCheck): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔒
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
02/18/2026 CVE reserved02/19/2026 Advisory disclosed
02/19/2026 VulDB entry created
02/19/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: 46408Researcher: Ozer Goker
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2019-25426 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2019-25426
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-346875
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 02/19/2026 14:24Changes: 02/19/2026 14:24 (81)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.