Owl opds up to 2.2.0.4 Network Request command injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 9.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Owl opds up to 2.2.0.4 and classified as critical. Affected is an unknown function of the component Network Request Handler. This manipulation causes command injection. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2026-2333. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability classified as very critical was found in Owl opds up to 2.2.0.4. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown part of the component Network Request Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a command injection vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-77. The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') in Owl opds 2.2.0.4 allows Command Injection via a crafted network request.
The weakness was presented by Luca Borzacchiello. It is possible to read the advisory at nozominetworks.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-2333 since 02/11/2026. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 02/27/2026). The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1202 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 9.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 9.8
VulDB Base Score: 9.8
VulDB Temp Score: 9.8
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Command injectionCWE: CWE-77 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
02/11/2026 CVE reserved02/20/2026 Advisory disclosed
02/20/2026 VulDB entry created
02/27/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: nozominetworks.comResearcher: Luca Borzacchiello
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-2333 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-2333
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-347203
Entry
Created: 02/20/2026 19:46Updated: 02/27/2026 12:45
Changes: 02/20/2026 19:46 (66), 02/27/2026 12:45 (10)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.