Chia Blockchain 2.1.0 /send_transaction cross-site request forgery

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability has been found in Chia Blockchain 2.1.0 and classified as problematic. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /send_transaction. This manipulation causes cross-site request forgery. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2026-3193. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Furthermore, there is an exploit available. The vendor was informed early via email. A separate report via bugbounty was rejected with the reason "This is by design. The user is responsible for host security".

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in Chia Blockchain 2.1.0. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown part of the file /send_transaction. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. As an impact it is known to affect integrity.

The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-3193. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details and also a public exploit are known.

It is possible to download the exploit at github.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vendor was informed early via email. A separate report via bugbounty was rejected with the reason "This is by design. The user is responsible for host security".

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

Version

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.1
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 2.9

VulDB Base Score: 3.1
VulDB Temp Score: 2.8
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CNA Base Score: 3.1
CNA Vector: 🔒

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Cross-site request forgery
CWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔒
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔒

EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔒

Timelineinfo

02/25/2026 Advisory disclosed
02/25/2026 +0 days VulDB entry created
03/06/2026 +9 days VulDB entry last update

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: github.com
Status: Not defined

CVE: CVE-2026-3193 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-3193
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-347749
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013

Entryinfo

Created: 02/25/2026 10:40
Updated: 03/06/2026 11:57
Changes: 02/25/2026 10:40 (55), 02/28/2026 21:38 (30), 03/06/2026 11:57 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

Interested in the pricing of exploits?

See the underground prices here!