Mobiliti e-mobi.hu WebSocket Application Programming Interface excessive authentication
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in Mobiliti e-mobi.hu. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component WebSocket Application Programming Interface. The manipulation leads to excessive authentication. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2026-20882. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Mobiliti e-mobi.hu (the affected version is unknown) and classified as critical. This issue affects an unknown code of the component WebSocket Application Programming Interface. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a excessive authentication vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-307. The product does not implement sufficient measures to prevent multiple failed authentication attempts within a short time frame, making it more susceptible to brute force attacks. Impacted is confidentiality, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
The WebSocket Application Programming Interface lacks restrictions on the number of authentication requests. This absence of rate limiting may allow an attacker to conduct denial-of-service attacks by suppressing or mis-routing legitimate charger telemetry, or conduct brute-force attacks to gain unauthorized access.
The weakness was presented by Khaled Sarieddine and Mohammad Ali Sayed. The advisory is shared at mobiliti.hu. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2026-20882 since 02/24/2026. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 03/12/2026). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1110.001 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.0VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.0
VulDB Base Score: 6.5
VulDB Temp Score: 6.5
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.5
CNA Vector (icscert): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Excessive authenticationCWE: CWE-307 / CWE-799 / CWE-400
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
02/24/2026 CVE reserved03/06/2026 Advisory disclosed
03/06/2026 VulDB entry created
03/12/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: mobiliti.huResearcher: Khaled Sarieddine, Mohammad Ali Sayed
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-20882 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-20882
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-349493
Entry
Created: 03/06/2026 17:28Updated: 03/12/2026 04:16
Changes: 03/06/2026 17:28 (74), 03/12/2026 04:16 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.