| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 9.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in scart 2.0. Impacted is an unknown function of the file scart.cgi. This manipulation of the argument page causes privileges management. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2006-7012. Furthermore, there is an exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as very critical was found in scart 2.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file scart.cgi. The manipulation of the argument page with an unknown input leads to a privileges management vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-269. The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
scart.cgi in SCart 2.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the page parameter of a show_text action.
The weakness was shared 02/14/2007 (Website). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2006-7012 since 02/14/2007. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details and also a public exploit are known. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 07/01/2024). MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1068 for this issue.
A public exploit has been developed by K-159 and been published even before and not after the advisory. It is possible to download the exploit at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 255 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (26921) and Exploit-DB (1876). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 9.8VulDB Meta Temp Score: 9.3
VulDB Base Score: 9.8
VulDB Temp Score: 9.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Privileges managementCWE: CWE-269 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Author: K-159
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
06/04/2006 🔍06/04/2006 🔍
02/14/2007 🔍
02/14/2007 🔍
02/14/2007 🔍
03/13/2015 🔍
07/01/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2006-7012 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2006-7012
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-35029
X-Force: 26921 - SCart scart.cgi command execution
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 03/13/2015 12:16Updated: 07/01/2024 04:29
Changes: 03/13/2015 12:16 (44), 08/19/2018 09:00 (13), 07/01/2024 04:29 (17)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.