Magazine3 Easy Table of Contents Plugin up to 2.0.80 on WordPress cross-site request forgery

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability was found in Magazine3 Easy Table of Contents Plugin up to 2.0.80 on WordPress. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-32343. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Magazine3 Easy Table of Contents Plugin up to 2.0.80 on WordPress. This issue affects an unknown code block. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. Impacted is integrity. The summary by CVE is:

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Magazine3 Easy Table of Contents easy-table-of-contents allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Easy Table of Contents: from n/a through <= 2.0.80.

The weakness was disclosed by Mike Montoya. The advisory is shared at patchstack.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2026-32343 since 03/12/2026. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Type

• WordPress Plugin

Vendor

• Magazine3

Name

• Easy Table of Contents Plugin

Version

• 2.0.0
• 2.0.1
• 2.0.2
• 2.0.3
• 2.0.4
• 2.0.5
• 2.0.6
• 2.0.7
• 2.0.8
• 2.0.9
• 2.0.10
• 2.0.11
• 2.0.12
• 2.0.13
• 2.0.14
• 2.0.15
• 2.0.16
• 2.0.17
• 2.0.18
• 2.0.19
• 2.0.20
• 2.0.21
• 2.0.22
• 2.0.23
• 2.0.24
• 2.0.25
• 2.0.26
• 2.0.27
• 2.0.28
• 2.0.29
• 2.0.30
• 2.0.31
• 2.0.32
• 2.0.33
• 2.0.34
• 2.0.35
• 2.0.36
• 2.0.37
• 2.0.38
• 2.0.39
• 2.0.40
• 2.0.41
• 2.0.42
• 2.0.43
• 2.0.44
• 2.0.45
• 2.0.46
• 2.0.47
• 2.0.48
• 2.0.49
• 2.0.50
• 2.0.51
• 2.0.52
• 2.0.53
• 2.0.54
• 2.0.55
• 2.0.56
• 2.0.57
• 2.0.58
• 2.0.59
• 2.0.60
• 2.0.61
• 2.0.62
• 2.0.63
• 2.0.64
• 2.0.65
• 2.0.66
• 2.0.67
• 2.0.68
• 2.0.69
• 2.0.70
• 2.0.71
• 2.0.72
• 2.0.73
• 2.0.74
• 2.0.75
• 2.0.76
• 2.0.77
• 2.0.78
• 2.0.79
• 2.0.80

CPE 2.3info

• 🔒
• 🔒
• 🔒

CPE 2.2info

• 🔒
• 🔒
• 🔒

CVSSv4info

CVSSv3info

CVSSv2info

Exploitinginfo

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Countermeasuresinfo

Timelineinfo

Sourcesinfo

Entryinfo

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion