| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Rhinosoft FTP Voyager up to 14.0.0.3. This affects an unknown function. The manipulation leads to stack-based overflow. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2007-1079. In addition, an exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Rhinosoft FTP Voyager up to 14.0.0.3. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a stack-based overflow vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-121. A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function). Impacted is availability. The summary by CVE is:
Stack-based buffer overflow in Rhino Software, Inc. FTP Voyager 14.0.0.3 and earlier allows remote servers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long response to a CWD command, which triggers the overflow when the user aborts the command.
The weakness was presented 02/20/2007 by Marsu Pilami with Marsu (Website). The advisory is shared at milw0rm.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2007-1079 since 02/22/2007. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available.
A public exploit has been developed in C++. The exploit is available at securityfocus.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (32593), Exploit-DB (3343), SecurityFocus (BID 22637†) and OSVDB (33746†). Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.8
VulDB Base Score: 7.5
VulDB Temp Score: 6.8
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Stack-based overflowCWE: CWE-121 / CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Programming Language: 🔍
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
02/20/2007 🔍02/20/2007 🔍
02/22/2007 🔍
02/22/2007 🔍
02/26/2007 🔍
03/13/2015 🔍
08/24/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: milw0rm.com⛔Researcher: Marsu Pilami
Organization: Marsu
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2007-1079 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2007-1079
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-35153
X-Force: 32593 - FTP Voyager CWD command denial of service
SecurityFocus: 22637 - FTP Voyager CWD Parameter Stack Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
OSVDB: 33746 - FTP Voyager CWD Command Abort Remote Overflow
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 03/13/2015 12:16Updated: 08/24/2024 07:58
Changes: 03/13/2015 12:16 (54), 10/13/2017 10:57 (8), 08/24/2024 07:58 (17)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.