Laborator Oxygen Plugin up to 6.0.8 on WordPress laborator_calc_route server-side request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.1 | $0-$5k | 5.75 |
Summary
A vulnerability identified as critical has been detected in Laborator Oxygen Plugin up to 6.0.8 on WordPress. Affected by this issue is the function laborator_calc_route. Performing a manipulation results in server-side request forgery.
This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2025-12886. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Laborator Oxygen Plugin up to 6.0.8 on WordPress. This affects the function laborator_calc_route. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a server-side request forgery vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-918. The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
The Oxygen Theme theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 6.0.8 via the laborator_calc_route AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.
The weakness was shared by Ahmed Rayen Ayari. The advisory is shared at wordfence.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-12886 since 11/07/2025. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 03/28/2026).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.1
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.2
CNA Vector (Wordfence): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Server-side request forgeryCWE: CWE-918
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
11/07/2025 CVE reserved03/28/2026 Advisory disclosed
03/28/2026 VulDB entry created
03/28/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: wordfence.comResearcher: Ahmed Rayen Ayari
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2025-12886 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2025-12886
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-354069
Entry
Created: 03/28/2026 08:04Changes: 03/28/2026 08:04 (65)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:913:103
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.