Endian Firewall 3.3.25 Parameter /cgi-bin/xtaccess.cgi remark cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Endian Firewall 3.3.25 and classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part of the file /cgi-bin/xtaccess.cgi of the component Parameter Handler. The manipulation of the argument remark leads to cross site scripting. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-34811. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Endian Firewall 3.3.25. This issue affects an unknown part of the file /cgi-bin/xtaccess.cgi of the component Parameter Handler. The manipulation of the argument remark with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. Impacted is integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Endian Firewall version 3.3.25 and prior allow stored cross-site scripting (XSS) via the remark parameter to /cgi-bin/xtaccess.cgi. An authenticated attacker can inject arbitrary JavaScript that is stored and executed when other users view the affected page.
The weakness was disclosed by Alex Williams. The advisory is shared at help.endian.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2026-34811 since 03/30/2026. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.9VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.9
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.5
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 6.4
CNA Vector (VulnCheck): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
03/30/2026 CVE reserved04/02/2026 Advisory disclosed
04/02/2026 VulDB entry created
04/02/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: help.endian.comResearcher: Alex Williams
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-34811 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-34811
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-354917
Entry
Created: 04/02/2026 17:32Changes: 04/02/2026 17:32 (78)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.