OneSearch One Search 1.1.0.0 search incorrect parsing of numbers with different radices
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.6 | $0-$5k | 0.13 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in OneSearch One Search 1.1.0.0. The affected element is the function Search. The manipulation leads to incorrect parsing of numbers with different radices.
This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2018-25242. The attack needs to be performed locally. Additionally, an exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in OneSearch One Search 1.1.0.0 and classified as problematic. This issue affects the function search. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a incorrect parsing of numbers with different radices vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-1389. The product parses numeric input assuming base 10 (decimal) values, but it does not account for inputs that use a different base number (radix). Impacted is availability. The summary by CVE is:
One Search 1.1.0.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows local attackers to crash the application by submitting excessively long input strings to the search functionality. Attackers can paste a buffer of 950 or more characters into the search bar to trigger an unhandled exception that crashes the application.
The weakness was released by 0xB9 as 46195. The advisory is shared at exploit-db.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2018-25242 since 04/04/2026. The exploitation is known to be easy. An attack has to be approached locally. Technical details as well as a public exploit are known.
The exploit is available at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Exploit-DB (46195) and EUVD (EUVD-2018-21738). Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA CVSS-B Score: 🔒
CNA CVSS-BT Score: 🔒
CNA Vector: 🔒
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.7VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.6
VulDB Base Score: 3.3
VulDB Temp Score: 3.0
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 6.2
CNA Vector (VulnCheck): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Incorrect parsing of numbers with different radicesCWE: CWE-1389
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔒
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔒
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔒
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
04/04/2026 Advisory disclosed04/04/2026 CVE reserved
04/04/2026 VulDB entry created
04/04/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: 46195Researcher: 0xB9
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2018-25242 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2018-25242
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-355361
EUVD: 🔒
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 04/04/2026 19:45Updated: 04/04/2026 22:24
Changes: 04/04/2026 19:45 (79), 04/04/2026 22:24 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:E13:103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.