UTT HiPER 520W 1.7.7-180627 /goform/formDia privilege escalation
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.1 | $0-$5k | 0.12 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in UTT HiPER 520W 1.7.7-180627. It has been rated as critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /goform/formDia. The manipulation leads to Remote Privilege Escalation. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2026-31059. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability was found in UTT HiPER 520W 1.7.7-180627 and classified as critical. This issue affects an unknown function of the file /goform/formDia. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a remote privilege escalation vulnerability. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
A remote command execution (RCE) vulnerability in the /goform/formDia component of UTT Aggressive HiPER 520W v3v1.7.7-180627 allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted string.
It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2026-31059 since 03/09/2026. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 04/06/2026).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.1
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Privilege escalationCWE: Unknown
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
03/09/2026 CVE reserved04/06/2026 Advisory disclosed
04/06/2026 VulDB entry created
04/06/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: github.comStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-31059 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-31059
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-355523
Entry
Created: 04/06/2026 18:27Changes: 04/06/2026 18:27 (51)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:CB5:103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.