kedro-org kedro up to 1.2.x dictConfig KEDRO_LOGGING_CONFIG code injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 8.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in kedro-org kedro up to 1.2.x. It has been rated as critical. This affects the function dictConfig. This manipulation of the argument KEDRO_LOGGING_CONFIG causes code injection.
This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2026-35171. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available.
Upgrading the affected component is advised.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in kedro-org kedro up to 1.2.x and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function dictConfig. The manipulation of the argument KEDRO_LOGGING_CONFIG with an unknown input leads to a code injection vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-94. The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Kedro is a toolbox for production-ready data science. Prior to 1.3.0, Kedro allows the logging configuration file path to be set via the KEDRO_LOGGING_CONFIG environment variable and loads it without validation. The logging configuration schema supports the special () key, which enables arbitrary callable instantiation. An attacker can exploit this to execute arbitrary system commands during application startup. This is a critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability caused by unsafe use of logging.config.dictConfig() with user-controlled input. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.3.0.
The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-35171 since 04/01/2026. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059 for this issue.
Upgrading to version 1.3.0 eliminates this vulnerability.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
Website
- Product: https://github.com/kedro-org/kedro/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 8.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 8.4
VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.0
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 9.8
CNA Vector (GitHub_M): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Code injectionCWE: CWE-94 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Upgrade: kedro 1.3.0
Timeline
04/01/2026 CVE reserved04/06/2026 Advisory disclosed
04/06/2026 VulDB entry created
04/06/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: GHSA-9cqf-439c-j96r
Status: Confirmed
CVE: CVE-2026-35171 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-35171
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-355621
Entry
Created: 04/06/2026 21:19Changes: 04/06/2026 21:19 (66)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:54A:103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.