Analytify Simple Social Media Share Buttons Plugin up to 6.2.0 on WordPress cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.2 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Analytify Simple Social Media Share Buttons Plugin up to 6.2.0 on WordPress. The impacted element is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-34904. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Analytify Simple Social Media Share Buttons Plugin up to 6.2.0 on WordPress. This affects some unknown processing. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Analytify Simple Social Media Share Buttons allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Simple Social Media Share Buttons: from n/a through 6.2.0.
The weakness was published by Carlos Ferreira. The advisory is shared at patchstack.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-34904 since 03/31/2026. The exploitability is told to be difficult. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at EUVD (EUVD-2026-19596). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.2
VulDB Base Score: 3.1
VulDB Temp Score: 3.0
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 7.5
CNA Vector (Patchstack): 🔒
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
03/31/2026 CVE reserved04/07/2026 Advisory disclosed
04/07/2026 VulDB entry created
04/07/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: patchstack.comResearcher: Carlos Ferreira
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-34904 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-34904
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-355725
EUVD: 🔒
Entry
Created: 04/07/2026 11:10Updated: 04/07/2026 15:07
Changes: 04/07/2026 11:10 (64), 04/07/2026 15:07 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.