RealMag777 FOX Plugin up to 1.4.5 on WordPress sql injection
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in RealMag777 FOX Plugin up to 1.4.5 on WordPress and classified as critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to sql injection. This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2026-39497. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in RealMag777 FOX Plugin up to 1.4.5 on WordPress. This issue affects an unknown part. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a sql injection vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-89. The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in RealMag777 FOX woocommerce-currency-switcher allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects FOX: from n/a through <= 1.4.5.
The weakness was released by Timomangcut. It is possible to read the advisory at patchstack.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2026-39497 since 04/07/2026. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The pricing for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 04/08/2026). The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1505 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.1
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.1
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Sql injectionCWE: CWE-89 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
04/07/2026 CVE reserved04/08/2026 Advisory disclosed
04/08/2026 VulDB entry created
04/08/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: patchstack.comResearcher: Timomangcut
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-39497 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-39497
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-356051
Entry
Created: 04/08/2026 11:16Changes: 04/08/2026 11:16 (55)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:3EE:103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.