kutethemes DukaMarket Plugin up to 1.3.0 on WordPress Web Page cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.4 | $0-$5k | 0.52- |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in kutethemes DukaMarket Plugin up to 1.3.0 on WordPress. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component Web Page. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2026-39628. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists.
Details
A vulnerability was found in kutethemes DukaMarket Plugin up to 1.3.0 on WordPress. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects an unknown functionality of the component Web Page. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-80. The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special characters such as "<", ">", and "&" that could be interpreted as web-scripting elements when they are sent to a downstream component that processes web pages. Impacted is integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) vulnerability in kutethemes DukaMarket dukamarket allows Code Injection.This issue affects DukaMarket: from n/a through <= 1.3.0.
The weakness was disclosed by João Pedro S Alcântara. It is possible to read the advisory at patchstack.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2026-39628 since 04/07/2026. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1059.007 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔒VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 3.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.4
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.4
VulDB Vector: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔒
VulDB Temp Score: 🔒
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-80 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔒
ATT&CK: 🔒
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔒
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔒
EPSS Percentile: 🔒
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔒
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔒
Timeline
04/07/2026 CVE reserved04/08/2026 Advisory disclosed
04/08/2026 VulDB entry created
04/08/2026 VulDB entry last update
Sources
Advisory: patchstack.comResearcher: João Pedro S Alcântara
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2026-39628 (🔒)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2026-39628
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-356147
Entry
Created: 04/08/2026 12:24Changes: 04/08/2026 12:24 (56)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:C46:103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.